Murder, she wrote. And committed.
-
I got all weirded out by finding out about a mystery writer recently. So now I don’t know whether I can keep reading her books or not. And I don’t know if that’s just me, or if it’s the kind of thing that other people would understand.
I had read a mystery by Anne Perry recently and liked it so much, I wanted to go find out a bit more about the author. The book — “A Christmas Guest” — seemed so authentic in its Victorian flavor, I wanted to know whether she was faking or not. So when I looked her up in Wikipedia, I was pleased to read …
Anne Perry (born Juliet Marion Hulme in Blackheath, London on 28 October 1938) is an English author of historical detective fiction, as well as a convicted murderer (see also Parker-Hulme murder).
What?
Honestly, my first thought was that the entry on Wikipedia had been hacked into by some prankster. Wikipedia, after all, is an open system. Anyone that wants to can post information, and surely this was a case of someone just goofing around. So I clicked on the link of the so-called ‘Parker-Hulme murder’ and went other places on the internet to fact-check.
Nope. It wasn’t a prank. When 70-year-old Juliet was 15, she and her best friend, Pauline, killed Pauline’s mother.
What happened was that the two friends had formed one of those incredibly close relationships that young girls sometimes get into, even populating a fantasy world full of interesting personalities and concocting scenarios that they acted out all night long. It’s the type of thing you can see innocently portrayed in “Little Women” and “The Secret World of Henry Orient,” and I think almost every girl can remember something like it.
In the case of Juliet and Pauline, their respective parents didn’t approve. They wanted to break up the pair, and so when Juliet was going to South Africa to cure her tuberculosis and Pauline wanted to go along, Pauline’s mother, Honora, said no.
And so they killed her. Their girlish little plan was to take Honora on a walk and, when they were in a remote spot, whack her with a brick and tell everyone she had fallen down. Only … well, there’s a lot that young girls don’t know about killing people. Without going into detail, it turned out to be much harder to kill her than they had thought, and their weak story became unbelievable. They were tried, condemned and went to jail for five years. One of the conditions of parole was that they would never have contact with each other again. And though that’s an odd condition, and though it’s been 50 years, the two have honored that condition and never seen each other since that time.
All of this, by the way, caused a huge scandal, as you would think. And it became the basis for the movie “Heavenly Creatures.”
But I’m finding that it’s troubling me. After I found this out, I couldn’t enjoy Anne Perry’s murder mysteries again. I kept telling myself, look, she did her time. It was all half a century ago. And there was absolutely nothing in the books to suggest that the author had first-hand knowledge of what it’s like to kill someone. But she did, and it changed things.
But I can’t get rid of the feeling that it just spoils the illusion of murder mysteries. I think of them as absolutely innocent reading. They rarely have the smut quotient that ruins so much modern fiction for me, and the ones I like aren’t violent. It’s just some problem-solving, really, with an eccentric detective, tea in the drawing room and clues found in the attic. All good fun.
So what do you do when the nice little facade is pulled back and you remember that actual murders end some lives and ruin others, break up families, have repercussions that go on for generations?
Am I just being strange that I can’t pick up her books now? I really don’t know.
Related posts:
- Abortion is murder, but that’s a woman’s right(?)
- Catman do
- “Pillars of the Earth” — yuck/ahh/wow!
- Bush tea and the sniffles with Mma Ramotswe
- Don’t go see “The Golden Compass”

6 Responses and Counting...
I read my first Anne Perry last year and had been told prior to about her history. I was familar with the movie, but have never seen it.
I agree, it kind of makes you feel a bit creeped out. But, I also cling very strongly to forgiveness and repentance that our church teaches.
The book I read, in case you are curious, was “A Breach of Promise” — it was for an online book club.
For what it’s worth, I think she’s a good writer. For the rest of it, I’ll just have to wait it out.
The problem isn’t a matter of forgiveness, or at least that’s not the way it feels. I don’t judge Perry for what happened so long ago, especially since I can’t think of any way (except in the mysterious realm of human connectedness) that her actions can be said to have affected me.
It’s more a matter that when you read someone’s book, you’re taking in a part of them. When I went off to Perry’s Website, she gave no mention of the murder in her biography. That omission is telling, it seems to me.
Interesting reaction. But I’ve read literary fiction and most of the most famous authors actually lived most of their fiction… adultery, drugs, wanton sexual encounters, etc. I guess, where does one draw the line and what does it say about us that we aren’t creeped out by “lesser sins”.
So what do you do when the nice little facade is pulled back and you remember that actual murders end some lives and ruin others, break up families, have repercussions that go on for generations?
Precisely. Having had two childhood friends murdered (one in the OKC bombing) I have little stomach for murder mysteries, in print or on television. The detective or the criminal become the center of attention in these stories and the victim not only loses their life but are also forgotten. One of the things I love about Orthodoxy is that people are remembered…sometimes for centuries after their death. And in a world filled with violence and chaos, remembering is sometimes the only thing we can do.…and we should do it with all our hearts.
From what I’ve read and heard from Anne Perry (I’ve seen her in person at an author’s reading, too), I think she is doing her best to repent of what she did back then. She is a member of the Church of the Latter-Day-Saints, so obviously she does not have the benefits a repenting Orthodox Christian would have. That said, I find her fiction very thoughtful. I wish I could put my finger on a particular passage I read that impressed me … but … it’s lost.
If you like her writing, though, I’d recommend trying more of it.
I like the way some crime fiction deals with moral issues. I’m thinking of writers like Louise Perry and Karin Fossum.
I’m not expressing myself very well today …
Anyway, I do remember being freaked out when I heard this about Perry’s past, too …
k:
Very late replying to this comment. Sorry, I lost track of things there for a bit.
Thanks very much for the input. I really did want someone to provide a little missing information. I’ll hang in there with her.