Is the Mouse afraid of the Lion?
-
Greg sent me this link with his usual brief subject line: Bloggable. He’s right, it is.
Disney has decided not to fund the third Narnia movie. They cite the low returns of ‘Prince Caspian.’ But that last Narnia movie made $419 million worldwide, (compared with the $249 million gross for a non-Christian fantasy movie like ‘Eragon’), and Hollywood Reporter says it’s unusual for a studio to pull out of a series. So is Disney afraid of the unabashedly Christian messages in the Narnia Chronicles?
I thought it might be, but when I looked into it a little, I guess the answer is: not necessarily …
Because it’s not so much that ‘Caspian’ made as what it didn’t make. It didn’t make back anywhere near the $745 million of ‘The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe’ (‘LW&W’ just to save keystrokes). And both films cost about the same amount to make — $200 million and $180 million, respectively.
So Disney looks at the $326 million drop-off in profit between Narnia I & II and concludes that the franchise interest is drying up. I don’t agree, but I can forgive them for thinking this way. I went off to Box Office Mojo and totted up numbers from the five Harry Potter movies and can see how the studio number-crunchers might see a problem. Here’s how the percentage of profits stack up for the two franchises:
Narnia:
- LW&W: 313.89%
- Prince Caspian: 109.50%
Potter:
- Harry Potter 1 680.80%
- Harry potter 2 778.00%
- Harry potter 3 511.54%
- Harry potter 4 497.33%
- Harry potter 5 525.33%
So really, you could make a case that the numbers are telling you it’s time to get while the getting is good. We could certainly all talk passionately about the need to look past things like mere profits. On the other hand, until we scrape together $200 million of our own, we probably won’t be making movies.
That’s not to say I think that Disney is right. Because I don’t think the numbers tell the whole story in this case. I think that Narnia fans could’ve told the studio that ‘Prince Caspian’ wouldn’t have a strong showing. All the Narnia chronicles are great, but with the points that Lewis made about the effect of WWII on England’s god-fearing people, ‘Caspian’ was always going to be a long, dark journey. It rewards patient and discerning movie-goers with some incredible insight from Lewis that are well worth the wait … but are movie-goers (especially young movie-goers, brought up on instant gratification and formulaic messages in movies) patient and discerning any more?‘Voyage of the Dawn Treader’ — the next in the series — seems to me that it would net better returns. I think movie-makers will find it easier to handle the pacing and action of this one, and the subplot about awful Eustace and how he finds redemption always seemed to me a powerful story.
I kind of hope so. With everything going on right now, I really think a new generation needs to hear what C. S. Lewis had to say.
Related posts:
- Bad movies, high prices … what’s wrong with this picture?
- Is Hollywood “a very Christian town?”
- Harry Potter — yeah, why not?
- 300
- Don’t go see “The Golden Compass”

5 Responses and Counting...
What Disney isn’t considering is that the receipts will probably be fairly consistent for the rest of the books. LW&W was always going to be the big one, of course, but people who went to see Prince Caspian have probably read all seven, and will probably want to see all seven.
Their real mistake, though, is giving the directors free reign to change pretty much anything they like. I just finished reading Prince Caspian to my four-year-old, and though I knew the movie was rather different, I didn’t grasp just how vastly different until I read the book again. I can see people getting fed up if they plan to do *that* with all the rest of the films. What they need to do is find a creative director who can make a great film *within* the confines of the story.
I may have to re-read Prince Caspian now. That was probably the one that was the most vague in my memory. My guess of the next book that would be great as a movie is The Magician’s Nephew, just because of the wonderful things they could do with the Creation segment.
But you’re right. It would depend on them not leaving things out.
I re-read Prince Caspian last week after we saw the DVD, I had no memory of the book, and when rereading it, I realized it is because it is a bridge book. Kh. Frederica wrote an article about the fact that she thinks the movie actually exceeds the book, and I agree with her.
And, I am shocked at this — I think that they’ve done such a good job with th movies and that there is a hardcore group of people who are fans and willing to be with them.
Even more than HP.
I’m the only one in the family who liked the PC and that is because it has been over 15 years since I last read it. OTOH, the kids and hubby and just finished re-reading it and were quite disappointed.
It is rather sad that Disney has done this since its seems to me that Voyage… is one of the best books in the series for many people (PC usually being near the bottom).
It would be interesting to compare the numbers for the Narnia series with the Golden Compass. I think HP numbers would be hard to reach for most books-to-movies.
I can provide some answers about how PC compared to Golden Compass (by way of http://www.boxofficemojo.com which, if I didn’t explain it, will give you the numbers on any movie you want).
The story is a little bit interesting. In America, PC earned about twice as much as Compass — $141 million vs. $70 million gross. But in foreign markets, Golden Compass earned $302 million and PC $278 million. So the worldwide comparison has them relatively close: PC — $419 million; Compass — $372 million.
We can all bemoan the superficiality of Christianity in America, but the fact is, it is still a prevalent cultural force here, not so much in ‘post-Christian’ Europe and elsewhere, where audiences were apparently either ignorant of Compass’ blatant anti-Christian message aimed at children or were okay with it.