“Lost” queries
-
I usually don’t go off-topic in this particular direction, but last night’s episode of “Lost” is another head-scratcher.(BTW, if you don’t do Lost, the following won’t make any sense to you. But if you think you’d ever like to find out what all the fuss is about, do what Greg and I did — rent the first season of it and watch the first show. You’ll know right away if you’re hooked or not. We were, and it’s the only show on right now that I’d bother with. Certainly the only one I’d still be thinking about the next day.)
- Could they possibly make this show any more complicated? Sun, Frank and Ben on one island in the present day; Sawyer, Kate, Jack, and most of the others on the other island in 1977. And Locke, Desmond and Baby Aaron … well, somewhere. And Dharma guys, Richard Widmore, hostiles, the French expedition, and new plane wreck people to keep straight? Honest to goodness, I never thought I could keep tabs on this many people. It’s like a Mormon family picnic.
- Be honest: when Sun hit Ben with the oar, didn’t you think that was pretty great? People are always having to trust that guy and he’s a bookish, boogly-eyed little psychopath.
- Do we think Ben actually killed Penny? And didn’t it drive you nuts that absolutely no one thought to ask Ben why he looked like he’d been in a train wreck when he got onto the plane?
- Speaking of Ben, can’t we just tell that there’s a big moral dilemma coming to Sayid? Do you kill Little-kid Ben in 1977 so that he can’t kill everyone in the Dharma Initiative years later?
I could probably go on all day, but it wouldn’t be a good idea.
Related posts:
- Harry Potter thoughts — w/o spoilers
- Too soon?
- Putting the “Lost Tomb” to bed
- Hollywood’s fear of controversy, cont.
- A post about Tom Cruise

5 Responses and Counting...
I wish Lost would have been set up as a 2–3 year macro-series. It was a really tight show for the first year or two, then it felt like they had to vamp for a few years after being more popular than they expected. That added unnecessary complexity that they now have to tie together with everything else. It’s like watching an old soap opera in its convolutions.
But, it’s still enjoyable.
BTW, Grey’s Anatomy felt like it had the same problem and even the highly feted Battlestar Galactica.
You’re right. We stopped watching for a while at season three. But they managed to make the season finale compelling enough that we hung in there, and I’d say they’ve managed to keep it going even after they had to do some of the unthinkable things like let the guys get off the island and give you *some* idea what’s going on on the island.
But the complexity is a little hilarious sometimes. Have you ever tried to explain this show to anyone? It sounds like something from a really bad dream journal.
Grey’s Anatomy and BG: You’ve named off two of the other shows we’ve thought about trying to catch up with. As I said, we’ve found that if you start renting it from the first season, you can come up to speed in your own time. Tried it with Heroes and found out that it’s not our thing.
I was dragged kicking and screaming into the LOST world, and love it. We were behind on seasons 1–3, and caucht up and have been watching 4 and now 5 in real time.
I did love when Sun beaned Ben. And, yes, I do think that’s what they are setting up.
I also watch Grey’s, The Office, and Big Bang Theory. That’s the total sum of my non-sports TV watching.
Oh cool, someone else coming from my perspective. I had gotten out of the habit of primetime television, but the things people were saying about this show made me curious. We’re in “real time” this season for the first time. It’s pretty great to do it on a DVD where there are no commercial breaks, but that’s the way it goes.
We were doing The Office, Scrubs and Lost. My interest in the other two is starting to wane.
Our college senior watches LOST. His older sisters watch Grey’s. His older brother watches almost nothing. We watch NCIS, Monk, Psych, and the Hallmark channel movies.