People-animal embryos

  • dog-girl.jpgWell, I haven’t had to add any­thing to the depress­ing Clone Count­down for a while, which is just as well. I don’t like feel­ing like there are a lot of peo­ple mon­key­ing around with DNA, ova, embryos and life itself as if they were all Tin­ker­Toys. And I hadn’t heard anythig new on this front. So maybe all’s well? But then comes this arti­cle in the Eng­lish paper “The Guardian”:

    Hybrid embryos get go-ahead

    The gov­ern­ment has over­turned its pro­posed ban on the cre­ation of human-animal embryos and now wants to allow them to be used to develop new treat­ments for incur­able dis­eases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.

    The pro­posal, in a new draft fer­til­ity bill pub­lished today, would allow sci­en­tists to cre­ate three dif­fer­ent types of hybrid embryos.

    Sci­en­tists would be allowed to grow the embryos in a lab for no more than two weeks, and it would be ille­gal to implant them in a human.

    The first kind of hybrid allowed under the bill, known as a chimeric embryo, is made by inject­ing cells from an ani­mal into a human embryo. The sec­ond, known as a human trans­genic embryo, involves inject­ing ani­mal DNA into a human embryo.

    The third, known as a cyto­plas­mic hybrid, is cre­ated by trans­fer­ring the nuclei of human cells, such as skin cells, into ani­mal eggs from which almost all the genetic mate­r­ial has been removed.

    ARGH! How hard is this? No animal-people! What is this, “The Island of Dr. Moreau”?

    And by the way, in case that caveat about it being “ille­gal” to implant the hybrid embryos into a per­son is sup­posed to make us all feel good, … well, it doesn’t. It’s ille­gal to smoke pot, oper­ate heavy machin­ery while intox­i­cated or cheat on your taxes, but if the Eng­lish stopped those endeav­ors their econ­omy would fail.

    And any­way, hybrid embryos were also ille­gal until this change, as the gov­ern­ment affirmed just six months ago. This para­graph might serve as a reminder that these sorts of per­ceived sci­en­tific advances are rarely con­tained for long:

    The move is a U-turn on pro­pos­als to out­law all types of human-animal embryos set out by min­is­ters in a white paper pub­lished last December.

    It seems a lit­tle silly not to know where this will end. Many peo­ple want a way out of their human­ity and out of the con­fines of what we know about life and death. If the world’s sci­en­tists all had the best inten­tions in the world, there is still no way they would be able to pre­vent this line of research from lead­ing to attempts to re-create mankind. They will fail in a sense, but even in attempt­ing it, they will re-define what it means to be a human being.

    Oh well. Maybe I can order up some­thing with my dog’s ears. That would be kind of neat.

    me-with-dog-ears.jpg

    Related posts:

    1. Peo­ple power
    2. Government-regulated Chris­tian­ity
    3. When famous peo­ple fast
    4. Is this what the [bleep] is going on?

4 Responses and Counting...

  • Karen 05.18.2007

    Lord have mercy on us.

  • I belong to this group http://handsoffourovaries.com/
    Its a group of Pro-Life and Pro-Choice peo­ple who are seek­ing to stop the sell­ing of human ovum for this type of exper­i­men­ta­tion.
    Sick and sad what we have come to…
    Some of the genetic exper­i­men­ta­tion on ani­mals is weird enough, pigs with cow hides, cows with noses that glow, ick…
    the hand­maid,
    Mary-Leah

  • I can see it now, years from hence, pic­ture two teenagers whis­per­ing together under a tree:

    “don’t talk to HER, she hasn’t been enhanced at all, can you imag­ine THAT?”

    Putting on my seri­ous hat now…

    Lord have Mercy…

  • hand­maid M-L:
    That must be an inter­est­ing group. I would think that it’s hard for peo­ple with tough stances that are dia­met­ri­cally opposed to get together on an issue that is related. But if you’ve worked it out, fab­u­lous. Because it seems obvi­ous that peo­ple com­ing from a Chris­t­ian per­spec­tive are never going to get lis­tened to on this.

Leave a Reply

* Name, Email, and Comment are Required