The impatience of atheists
-
When it comes to Orthodox evangelism, I wonder if we’re missing the point.
I was handed a pamphlet on a street corner a couple years ago. The title was something like “Do YOU know where YOU’RE going after you DIE???” I looked it over, and it struck me that it had some strange ideas about who non-believers were.
They imagined sneering scoffers asking questions like “Jesus Christ? Isn’t he just another TEACHER like Buddha or Confucius???” or “But SCIENTISTS have proven that there’s no such thing as heaven, RIGHT???” And, more bizarrely, they imagined that those people have to shut up — or at least stop talking in all-caps — if you just give them the right Bible verse.
This isn’t a very reasonable outlook. It’s as if the doubters that surround us on all sides were lapsed Sunday School teachers with amnesia (“Wait a minute. You mean II Corinthians says so? Boy, what a jerk I’ve been!”).
The word for it — or one of the words for it — is ‘derivative.’ Like when you look up ‘perspicacious’ in the dictionary and it says ‘the state of exhibiting perspicacity.’ That’s a cute trick for a dictionary-writer, but when the aim is evangelism, it’s just delusional. Non-believers don’t believe that the Bible is an authoritative text; if they did, they’d already be devout Christians or Jews.
And we Orthodox are just as bad. I’ve never met a non-believer who put credence the Church Fathers or in theology, but you wouldn’t know it sometimes to hear what passes for apologetics in our circles. We seem to imagine scores of non-Orthodox who believe in the authority of the Fathers, Church history, theology … AND the Bible.
If my very limited personal experience is any indication, we are not accorded a lot of time to make our points, so we can’t afford to miss the most obvious fact about atheists — they don’t believe in our God, or any god. When they go on the attack about Biblical accuracy or the Church, it’s just by way of saying that everything we base our beliefs on is superstitious or spurious. I can’t see thinking that it’s time to craft an elaborate answer based on theology.
I understand why we get this way. We prefer our straw-man atheist to the real thing. It’s very distressing to realize that much of our personal experience with the living God that can’t be put into words, and that goes also for the combined experiences of the Body of Christ through the centuries that give us the testament of history and teaching. For all of that to be dismissed or held in contempt is almost unbearable, which is why so few of us can actually stand to try to argue these things for very long.
But I don’t know. If we’re not going to try, that might still be better than wading in with a false set of expectations. We would do a lot better, it seems to me, to BE Orthodox, sane and intelligent — because in merely existing, we would challenge an atheist’s conception of who WE are.
Just a thought ….
Related posts:
- Rats! and atheists!
- The scary Mary prayer
- Think atheists don’t believe in the Easter Bunny?
- About meditation
- Christian music: Sweet-singing or something else?

6 Responses and Counting...
Well said.
Amen, sister. Most of what passes for evangelism by any ilk of Christians is mostly an embarrassment. We deserve the contempt of most we try to evangelize IMO.
Your blog entry reminded me of these quotes… I hope I attributed them correctly.
“Most people don’t reject Christianity, they reject a false caricature of Christianity.” C.S. Lewis
“Preach the gospel always. If necessary use words.” St. Augustine
I wince when I see the way “Christianity” is generally portrayed in the American media. I know that if I was seeking truth, listening to TV evangelists and such would make me scratch my head and think, “THAT can’t possibly be the truth …
Who can blame people for rejecting the circus of “Christianity” when what they see, hear, and read is so melted down and convoluted and confusing. May God have mercy on believers who seek to live lives of repentance, worship, and good works. May others see these things and be drawn to the Holy Trinity.
By the way, I just thought I’d throw this in for free: I LOVE GRACE BROOKS. Having a cup of tea with you right now would be my idea of a heavenly afternoon.
If I could, I grab the car keys and drive a few thousand miles to get to your kitchen table…even if the tea might be a little cooled off by the time I got there.
; )
Suzie B.:
*Excellent* quotes! Doesn’t it figure that great minds would be able to economize my point down to one sentence?
That is so darn sweet I can’t stand it. And if it doesn’t just sound like we’re starting our own Mutual Admiration Society, I can return the compliment. There’s no one I’d rather see showing up on the doorstep — with or without the teapot (!!)