The problem with ‘peace’
-
I thought the Orthodox Study Bible footnote to Luke 12:51 (“Do you suppose that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you, not at all, but rather division.”) was worth extra attention.
There are two kinds of peace. False peace, to which Chist refers here, is a shallow harmony that results from ignoring issues of truth. Genuine peace is a reconciliation to God through faith in Christ and surrender to truth. Genuine peace has division as a byproduct, because not everyone wants truth. In the fallen world, divisions are necessary for truth to be manifest.
That just seems … well, like some pure truth.
To name just one manifestation of this difficult process, I’ve heard people deride the bickering tone they hear in the halls of power, both national and international. But I don’t know if we’re always being patient or discerning — probably just not liking the sound of disunity. But we have enormous problems to figure out right now, and courses to try to chart. And unfortunately for those who love the “third way” answer, I don’t think there are many easy compromises left. I don’t really want politicians and lawmakers and generals to be MOST concerned with harmony; I want them to be concerned with the truth. And getting at the truth can be a very noisy process.
Related posts:
- “Peace I give, not as the world gives”
- Vida loca and peace of mind
- Fasting and peace
- Inward peace
- Is the Mouse afraid of the Lion?

2 Responses and Counting...
YES!! I agree whole-heartedly. It makes me nuts when people try to “nice over” the problem to avoid solving it. Solving it always gets sweaty and gritty, but in the end, you SOLVED it. Instead of putting a lace cloth over it and hoping it won’t wiggle too much and knock over the vase of roses.
Amen and amen! I’ve heard women say amongst themselves (somewhat self-righteously, it seems to me) that if women ruled the world, there wouldn’t be any wars. I’m not sure that’s true, but even if it is, there are worse things than wars. Like endless, endless cold wars with constant “dialoguing” and no hope of decisive resolution.