Thinking about civility and Orthodox centrism
-
Recently, talk of civility has been in the news. It’s also something I’ve heard Orthodox friends bemoan. Too much shrillness, not enough mannerly dialoguing.
That’s right, of course, when it comes to things that don’t really matter. But the closer you get to the front lines, the louder the noise gets. It is true that we gentle church-going folk need to step away from the fracas this Lent to a quiet place where we can spend time with our church and our family, reflect on our own podvig, ponder God’s grace in our lives.
But I think we make a mistake to leave it to others to defend our common culture, which is becoming more Christianity-challenged all the time. Conservatives have been doing the heavy lifting for decades, but most Orthodox, in my experience, not only won’t lend a hand, but criticize them almost as much as liberals do. I don’t mind that Orthodox don’t like to argue, but it bugs me that we silence those who can, even when the alternative is giving ground when we can least afford to. I sympathize in some ways — it’s more consistent with our outlook to be gentle as doves than to be wise as serpents. But I don’t know if the times we live in allow us to cherry-pick that much.
There are problems, of course, with some of the messengers on the right, just as there are on the left. But I find that most of my centrist friends are far more dismissive of bad messengers on the left than the right. And even more amazingly to me, incredible stereotypes about those on the right are taken at face value, despite daily evidence that the media is mightily practicing a double standard. When a Wisconsin Democrat yells to a Wisconsin Republican “You’re f***ing dead!” it doesn’t make headlines. But somehow when Sarah Palin’s office uses images of crosshairs over congressional districts, THAT’s deemed inappropriate (a year later — but hey, sometimes rage takes a while). And it would get boring to go into the myriad other examples.
I used to just blame the media for not reporting things like this, but I’ve noticed that when the stories do get reported, centrists retreat from them and prefer the simpler answer of gentler times: You can trust a left-leaning narrative more than any other; you can trust media voices on the left more than others.
Their very liberal friends may lose them when they go way, WAY too far, but they are usually indulged in their right to do so, and afterwards, their sound-bytes are deemed benign. When these are really crazy people, the assumption is that they are really harmless. When they are media voices, there’s a kind of assumption that they know what they’re doing.
There’s a reason I’m trying to figure this out. Greg and I are starting out on a venture that will put us into the aforementioned fracas on the right-of-center side. I’ve been thinking about how to square that with my church life and my personal life. And it’s not like I won’t have my work cut out for me, but I wish I knew why things in the Orthodox world seem so stacked against conservatism.
Feel free to weigh in.
Related posts:
- Cradle and convert Orthodox
- Becoming Orthodox by Peter E. Gillquist
- The Orthodox convert list
- Is Orthodox conversion on the rise?
- The Orthodox problem in Jerusalem

7 Responses and Counting...
Hm. I thought Orthodoxy was stacked against liberalism, especially among converts. Must be the circles I run in.
I find that as a whole the folks in my church are way more liberal politically than I am. If it weren’t for the fact that I am sure in Orthodoxy “We have seen the true light; we have received the heavenly Spirit; we have found the true faith, worshiping the undivided Trinity, for the Trinity has saved us.” I would be back in and Anglican break-away church. Politically, they are much closer to where I am.
Could it be that the concept of God’s love triumphs over all lends one to a social policy that is more liberal than the individualism one sees in Evangelical circles that, while helping the TRULY poor, demands more personal responsibility and therefore is more conservative?
Last night when I went to church for the Great Canon, I parked behind a car with a McCain Palin sticker on it. I wonder who THAT belogns to?
s-p:
You know, you’re right, now that I think of it. “Out-there” libs or conservs tend to get a neutral-to-frosty response.
You make me realize that it’s not the Out-there stuff I’m talking about — I don’t like those guys either. I need to spend a little bit more time figuring out just what I *am* talking about. I didn’t bother to define it, but I should. May need to carry that over onto a new post, if I’m going to blather on (which I probably will).
AC:
I liked how you condensed down “the message” of conservatism. I realize that it’s the message I’m really talking about. It seems so obvious to me that the culture is dominated by a secular-humanist narrative that I can’t understand how Orthodox could still consider some of the biggest shills for that worldview as credible sources.
There’s another dynamic that I’ve been trying to get to, but haven’t done a very good job. When liberals talk — even if they’re shrill — they’re indulged by centrists and sometimes believed. When conservatives take issue with liberals — which we HAVE to do, because liberals have been the dominant culture-creators for some time — we’re perceived as being obnoxious, contentious and all the rest of the stereotype.
But since Orthodox people KNOW that the world’s culture isn’t our culture, why don’t they take issue with the Old Guard of culture-creators. Why do so many of them buy into the very weakest liberal lip-service of being kindhearted, when their policies are anything but? I still can’t understand that.
There is a blindness to liberalism. The antidote is realism. Realism is neither right nor left.
There is also traditionalism. I think one of the things that struck me when I went to one of the first parish life conferences a few years ago was how much I felt as if I were in a time warp to an earlier generation. The confidence in God, the confidence that there is a public place and role for the church… simply weren’t undermined. And the people and their family focus seemed to give off the sense of insight into a different America… more like the one that made/built the country than the one that “lived off the fat of the land”.
I think this is some of the difference with Orthodoxy. Now where an individual takes it from there can really go any direction. What’s changed is our sense of bearings through media obliteration is that we see in one-dimension most of the time, and what’s missed is how this narrows the vision and reduces realism.
James:
Blindness, etc. — I think this is what I’m afraid of. The nice, centrist people that I know seem to show an endless capacity to buy into the benign liberal sound-bytes that are constantly being broadcasted at them. If they notice that there’s a basic problem and a basic mendacity, they turn into cynical realists and don’t want to believe in anything (sort of like lapsed Catholics that become atheists).
If that only affected world politics or something, it would be terribly off-message for me to dive into it here. But since, in the words of Fr. Schmemann, “All of culture and all that is in culture is about the Kingdom of God — either for or against,” I feel like I’m seeing so many people that I know gently gliding over a cliff.